Daily Tweets from Twitter…

  • 10:34 New Humor Column : The Great Pantry Purge of 2010 bit.ly/a2gVv2 #
  • 18:02 My arch-nemesis, at least when it comes to washing the dishes … oatmeal. #
  • 18:03 And who in their right mind, you ask, eats oatmeal in Florida when it’s 95 degrees out?! My wife … Doh!, indeed. #
  • 19:00 A minor distraction from a busy day… #lego #toystory twitpic.com/1s9pa3 #
  • 22:30 Just saw a sign for Creative Dental Care – there are a lot of things that I want my dentist to be, but "creative" is not one of them! #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter
Follow me on Twitter as ssevener

Daily Tweets from Twitter…

  • 09:29 So really, what’s the point of still making us write out the amount in words when we write checks? Just to prove how inane paper checks are? #
  • 09:30 I mean, I only write out THREE actual paper checks the entire month anymore and those are to not-so-tech-savvy places. #
  • 09:32 It just seems archaic – forty-two dollars and ninety-eight cents vs. $42.98. From a Twitter perspective, what a waste of 34 characters! #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter
Follow me on Twitter as ssevener

Afterthoughts…

After writing this, I realized that I think I hit on something with that last point – how much of the younger generations even read newspapers anymore, at least in the traditional sense??? If it’s such a low number that it’s inversely proportional to the amount who use DVRs, then maybe that’s the key – newspapers cater to their audience, who really aren’t using DVRs, anyways. Kind of like the concept that the average age in Congress is something like 64 years-old … a sad reality for the current time, but eventually there will need to be a shift or the whole thing will just die with them. Hell, a lot of people in my generation would cite that newspapers are already dead anyways, so maybe I need to just stop nursing them along and catch up with my own people… 🙂

Is the Media Ruining Reality TV???

So this has been happening to me a lot lately, specifically with The Celebrity Apprentice. We don’t watch the show live – we almost always watch a night or two later, and inevitably the last couple of weeks, I’ve known who got fired before ever watching the actual episode, whether via a headline in a paper’s RSS feed or even right on the damn cover of our local free daily. Needless to say, I’ve been more than a little pissed about it…

…because here’s what I think is interesting – I don’t really follow a lot of “traditional media,” but they’re the ones who still seem to be at the root of my problem here. I’m not reading on Facebook or Twitter who lost, I’m finding it in the newsfeeds of the only actual “newspaper” that I still read (our local one) or on the cover of the free daily paper that I pick up on the corner. It’s not on any of the blogs that I read, or even on digg.com – really, it’s only the print dinosaurs that are fucking this up for me!!!

And that’s why I’m wondering if this is mostly a generational problem – maybe us young’uns who grew up with the Internet understand the concepts of netiquette and spoilers, whereas the older guys are still pinned on their whatever grabs the readers’ attention-mentality to afford them another week of survival. Which in itself is amusing simply because I’m getting a lot closer to just turning them off altogether and getting my news from publishers who actually get that not everyone has had a chance to watch the season finale of American Idol just yet…


I can’t be the only one who has these frustrations … how many people are using DVRs these days??? Is the solution just to ignore the news altogether while your favorite shows are running so that you actually get to experience them firsthand? Or here’s a thought – maybe the paper could just go with “Idol Winner Announced!” instead of “HERE’S THE DUDE’S NAME WHO WON!!!” I know it’s not as catchy as the prior, but is there something to be said about not pissing off a chunk of your audience in the process?

Daily Tweets from Twitter…

  • 09:58 Woohoo! RT New D&D podcast about Darksun tinyurl.com/33zj4j6 – DM is @tychobrahe played by @pvponline, @cwgabriel, and @krisstraub #
  • 13:03 Eye Appointment, Take 2 … This Time It’s VISUAL! #
  • 13:18 Eyesight Restored! Prescription changed a little, but at least now I can SEE! #
  • 13:20 Having just worn the wrong contacts on and off for the last five days, you really take forgranted the ability to SEE CLEARLY! Wow… #
  • 13:21 I mean, I could see shapes and colors fine, and I think you brain can work off of previous knowledge (i.e. what a STOP SIGN looks like)… #
  • 13:22 …but detail, mostly on computer screens, was absolute shit. It was almost like I couldn’t focus on details – night and day difference now! #
  • 20:32 Every time I step into a Walmart to do my grocery shopping, it’s like I can see two hours of my life just slipping away… #
  • 20:39 Can you say ‘traumatized’??? twitpic.com/1rnx9l #
  • 20:53 All the fun of delivering pizzas WITHOUT the slave wages! twitpic.com/1ro1kd #
  • 21:00 Cinnamon Roll-flavored pudding?! Bill Cosby never ceases to amaze me… twitpic.com/1ro3lr #
  • 21:06 WILD! Grape! (can you tell that I distract easily tonight???) twitpic.com/1ro5ji #
  • 21:55 An hour and 22 minutes later, our hero emerges from Walmart victorious…and tired. #
  • 21:59 You HAVE a stop sign, so you NEED TO stop; I DON’T HAVE a stop sign, so I DON’T NEED TO stop. That’s how this whole "Stop Sign Thing" works. #
  • 22:00 *This Twitter driving lesson brought to you by some crazy bitch who just tried to cut me off.* #
  • 22:01 P.S. Sitting at a stop light now … don’t text and
    drive. #obvious #disclaimer #
  • 22:36 @GeneDoucette As long as you collect royalties on the sale, ANYTHING is rational behavior. #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter
Follow me on Twitter as ssevener

One last thing…

I thought of this, but couldn’t figure out where to fit it into the previous multi-post Facebook diatribe, but another thing that I personally really like Facebook for is vaguely keeping up with people from my past.

Explanation: My argument for not really giving a shit about my high school reunion was always that for the people who I really cared about, I would continue to stay in touch with anyways … and for the most part this has remained more or less true. On the other hand, the main reason to go to a reunion isn’t to catch up with your best friends, but to see how everyone else managed to turn out – who had kids, who’s living where, who’s doing what, and so forth…

I like Facebook for this reason because I can be friends with someone and see random updates from their life without actually having to get really invested to hear the entire story, and that might sound kind of crude, but face it, it’s realistic because think of how many of your Facebook friends you’ve actually talked to on the phone or in person recently. For me, it’s almost none because sometimes I can barely find the time to call my closest of friends, so to keep up with a few dozen people that I went to school with or the guys I worked with at summer camp, for example, would just require way too much phone time and frankly, between my scheduling and theirs, it would probably never happen.

But nonetheless, I’ve been able to reconnect, at least somewhat, with a lot of those people via Facebook because even if I still never really talk to them, at least now I know that Dave married Jenna and is living in Texas with their kids or that Terry lives out on the west coast and still plays in a band, and so on. Basically, Facebook has taken the place of the reunion for me, except that it’s updated all of the time and probably gives me a lot more information than I would ever get from a couple of dozen five minute conversations once every ten years. We may not be as close of friends anymore, but I’m still curious about what’s going on in their lives from time to time, and for me, Facebook fulfills that need very well.

The only thing that it doesn’t give me is the dirt about the people who I didn’t like – who knocked up who and what kinds of crappy jobs that they’re doing now – but that’s just because I refuse to friend people who I truly hated growing up. As much as I’d love to confirm that the guy who used to shove me into my locker every day freshmen year is now shoveling shit somewhere, friend just doesn’t seem like the appropriate word!

Maybe nosy acquaintance who really wants to gloat, but certainly not friend

Diggnation on Facebook Privacy

I found myself agreeing with a lot of the points from this Diggnation clip where Kevin and Alex give their feedback on a recent article alleging 10 Reasons Why YOU Should Quit Facebook . Kevin provides a unique perspective as the CEO of another large social networking site and he hits on a lot of good points that actually make sense if you peel back the pure “corporations are evil” layer and actually try to look at it from the angle of someone trying to grow a business…

http://revision3.com/diggnation/facebook/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-facebook

More About Facebook Privacy and the Benefits of Facebook…

I guess the funny thing is, the more I hear everyone complaining about all of Facebook’s privacy blunders, the biggest threat that always gets thrown around is, “Well I’ll just stop using it – Facebook’s not all that great…” and maybe I don’t know exactly how they’re using it, but from my own perspective, believe it or not I’d actually disagree.

The reason for this is that sure, I’ve had an online presence for a long time. I’ve written a blog since 2003, I’ve ran websites featuring my writing since 1999, and even maintained groups on telnet systems before that. Add Twitter on top of everything and there’s certainly no shortage of me online, but here’s the thing – not everyone is like me. In fact, the vast majority of my friends and family aren’t, but Facebook changed all of that. Most of my friends would never actually maintain a blog or even get into something like Twitter, but for some reason they’ll put random status updates up on Facebook when something interesting happens in their lives. And the same with photos – before Facebook (and admittedly MySpace), you pretty much had to sign up for a separate service like Flickr to post photos online, but now you can include those on your Facebook page, too.

So hands down, I think one of the huge benefits to Facebook is that they’ve created a conduit to create online presences for people who otherwise normally wouldn’t have one … which unfortunately is also somewhat of a burden because as these people are new to the concept of putting their lives online, unfortunately they’re kind of stupid as far as knowing what they should and shouldn’t be concerned about posting. Also a factor is the concern about what you consider private – I distinctly remember a scene a few years back when some of my family was shocked that you could type my Grandparents’ address into Google Maps and see their house pinpointed on a map, even though technically anyone with a phonebook and a road atlas could’ve done the same thing decades ago. It’s a perception of what could happen – are you concerned that someone knows what town you live in, or that they know what flavor of ice cream you ate last night because you threw up a post that said, “Mmmmmm – I love me some Chunky Monkey!”

I guess ultimately it’s a matter of educating this new crowd, and the trouble is, I’m not sure if that’s Facebook’s responsibility or someone else’s. I saw one rant the other day about how Facebook is deceiving when you join because of the lack of information on its homepage before you sign-up, which I think is a bunch of bullshit because the users still need to have some responsibility when they sign up. You don’t just randomly jump around to various sites, giving them your name and e-mail address because they asked for it … or your phone number, or home address, for that matter. You wouldn’t hand those out to just some random guy on the street, so why put them on your Facebook profile where you have a perceived level of privacy for the free service that you’re receiving??? Or do we just scold Facebook for soliciting that kind of data in the first place? The real trouble is, I have a feeling that people are getting bent out of shape about a lot more than just addresses and phone numbers, which tells me that ultimately they just want a private service … maybe someday Facebook will offer a private version that comes with a monthly subscription fee.

Oh wait – people have already protested paying $3.99/month for Facebook, despite those being nothing more than rumors!

I don’t know what else to say except don’t post it online unless you either don’t care about it being public or you’re paying somebody specifically to keep it private. Good grief, this became a much longer rant than I ever would’ve anticipated…

Why I Don’t Care About All of the Facebook Privacy Scares…

People don’t think when they put things online anymore. Maybe this is partially the fault of Facebook, who boasts 400+ million users, the vast majority of them who’ve never had a public presence prior to Facebook, but I still can’t help but roll my eyes when I see one privacy complaint after another when if people truly cared about this information, they wouldn’t be putting it on their Facebook profile in the first place…

Case in point – it boggles my mind to see how many of my friends and family have their cell phone numbers on their Facebook profile, or even their home address. Now for me, I don’t care if any random stranger knows that I like Legos or Jimmy Buffett, but the numbers to call me or even show up on my doorstep? I’d certainly prefer that those aren’t made public, so I don’t post them online. I do make my e-mail address public, mainly because it’s already posted on all of my websites anyways, and I guess I just always figured if somebody really wanted to call me over the phone, they can ask me for my number via e-mail if they don’t already have it.

Maybe it’s a problem with Facebook being overly ambitious because it’s very clear that they don’t want to be one stop on the Information Superhighway – they want to be the stop on the Information Superhighway, and thus especially with their latest move with Facebook Connects, they’d love to have ties in pretty much everything you do online, from being your photo album, your address book, your e-mail and chat conduit, and your place to meet and relate with friends online. And while a lot of that may sound great to users, the problem is that it’s almost like this is a new subset of people who don’t even realize what they should and shouldn’t be sharing online anymore.

And I know it sounds cold, but frankly I just don’t have a whole lot of sympathy for that.

Really, whose responsibility should it be to control your personal informationYOU or this giant corporation that’s trying to make a profit? I know that it’s popular to blame Facebook because don’t get me wrong – they have made some really stupid moves, especially with toggling their privacy settings on and off – but ultimately Facebook can’t share something against your will if you don’t give it to them to share in the first place.

If you look at my Facebook profile, it’s completely public because honestly, that’s my perspective of the Internet. I’m not a fan of walled gardens, so anyone who wants to see my information is more than welcome. But again, I’m very careful about what I post – I don’t have my most intimate of contact information, I don’t post questionable photos of my friends and family, and I don’t put comments on my wall that might get me into trouble later. So from that perspective, I don’t really care what Facebook does with its privacy settings because I don’t think that they’re necessary.

Sure, they’re necessary if you want to use Facebook as a private platform for communicating with a specific group of friends, but then again, I’m not so sure that I’d trust a free application from a for-profit company to do something like that, knowing that their business model is based on putting your personal information to use for them! Facebook is first and foremost a corporation trying to please its investors, and even though it’s also proven to be a great tool for communicating with others, make no mistake – their loyalty is to their shareholders because they’re the ones that keep them in business. At best, you’re one of a mass population that helps them sell ads, but even then, if you’re super-strict about keeping your privacy settings locked down, you’re probably not doing much to keep them afloat, so why should they care about what you want?

(to be continued…)