Rocket Man … well, sort of…

Granted, I was a little more excited about this headline before I saw the actual video, but all in all this is still pretty freaking cool…

‘Jetman’ zooms along rim of Grand Canyon in first US flight

I think the wings are what’s kind of dampened it for me, but still – 8 minutes of flight time at speeds of up to 190 mph?! Even flying 200 feet above the Grand Canyon is about 197 feet higher than I’m capable of getting! I suppose he technically jumped out of a helicopter to get the actual altitude, so it may be debatable whether this is the jetpack that we all imagine or more of a jet-powered glider, but still, this gets us one step close to fighting zeppelins in the air should a band of Interplanetary Fascists attempt to overcome the human race!

Thin Post : The Next 8 lbs…

Because it can be so devastating when I don’t necessarily make them, I’ve been trying to be a little more realistic lately when it comes to setting goals for weight loss.

It’s really to look at the big picture and get a little spooked, if you ask me – sure, a year down the road I’d like to be at my ideal weight, 60 pounds lighter for all of my efforts, but in reality that can be a lot to choke on, especially when an analytical person like me starts breaking it down into needing to lose X pounds per month, X pounds per week, and feeling “behind” if I fall out of said schedule. I’ve done it this way for a long time and it never seems to get me anywhere except disappointed when I fall behind, so instead I’ve decided to try something different…

Instead I’m trying to look at my weight loss progress in the short term – right around 8 lbs at a time. I picked 8 lbs for a couple of reasons – it’s a fairly reasonable, albeit a little competitive goal for one month (at 2 lbs/week), it’s a goal that I can actually enter into WiiFii (which caps at something like 8-10 lbs, a far cry from 60!), and it’s also right around 1 BMI point (depending on who’s math that you use). Not to mention, psychologically I think it’s an easier goal to process because “only 3 more pounds to go!” sounds a lot more motivating than “only 47 more pounds to go!”

The more I go through all of this, I think that an awful lot of diet and weight lot is extremely psychological – reconditioning your body to eat more veggies and less junk, drinking water, and getting more exercise on a regular basis – so to me it also makes sense that I need to give my brain some more reasonable goals to work towards along the way. Right now I’m about 2 lbs away from hitting a personal threshold, that being the max of how much I’ve ever been able to lose weight in a single effort, and for some reason looking at it in baby steps just makes overcoming it seem a whole lot more attainable.

Besides, how’s that old saying go? “You didn’t put all of the weight on in a few weeks, you can’t expect to lose it that way, either.” That’s definitely the truth for me – I’ve consistently put on about 5 lbs a year since my early 20s if I look back over the years, so it was certainly a slow process adding it on. Granted, I’d like to do a little better at taking it back off, but it still seems like taking it a smaller chunk at a time is a lot more reasonable than jumping right in, trying to bite off more than I can chew, and then ultimately being disappointed in the end.

Just lose the next 8 lbs – I can do that!

Orly Taitz is a crazy person.

Have you ever really dug in deep with these birther folks?

I mean really deep – like up to your shoulders, wondering if you’re ever going to see your arms again! If you have, you’ve probably come across the sagelike lawyer/dentist/all around nutjob that is Orly Taitz…

Apparently Orly is pivotal in the birther movement, meaning that she’s known for tying up courtrooms around the country with any shred of “evidence” that she can get her paws on. It’s enough to almost make me feel good when Lawrence O’Donnell just tears into the lady halfway through the interview when it becomes clear that she has no intention of following the specific talking points that had been outlined for the show.

Of course, at least she can count on Stephen Colbert to give her a fair shake…

“You’ll agree that I just made an important point…”

WordPress Bug Talk

I know that this one is going to get a little more technical than most, but after battling with WordPress over something that in retrospect just seems incredibly inane, I feel the need to pronounce my victory in a public forum such as this…

So on one of the sites that I’m currently revamping (and hoping to officially launch in May), I’m doing a lot with photo galleries embedded in pages … probably not using pages exactly the way that was intended, but it seems to get the job done so I’m not going to complain. Anyways, the trouble started when I wanted to introduce a related posts plugin that also accommodates pages – the plugin technically works great, however one tiny detail in the format that I wanted for the output really just managed to throw me for a loop.

Basically, despite my pages being nested – sometimes several levels deep – in the related posts output, I always wanted to see the top-level mentioned instead of a page’s immediate parent. For example:

Photo Galleries —> Food —> Watermelon

becomes

  • (Photo Galleries) Watermelon

not

  • (Food) Watermelon

So the trick here is that you can’t simply look to a page’s parent, you need to loop through all of its parents’ parents until you get back to the top. The good news is, there’s actually a function already in WordPress to do exactly this. The bad news is, it’s broken!

I discovered this the hard way after feeling triumphant one night about solving my problem, then getting up the next day to find that it was only sometimes working. Most of the time I would get the correct “grandparent,” but for one page in particular I got back a null value instead, despite seeing the hierarchy plain as day through the main admin interface. From there I tore apart the database tables looking for an incorrectly populated relationship, started from scratch with the function itself, and even tried deleting and rebuilding the page, thinking that it might be a problem from when the page was originally generated.

Nothing, until another day at random I happened across this page

Apparently it’s a caching problem that was found almost two years ago, however obviously being not a very high priority just never got addressed. Fortunately in my case, though, a workable fix was found at the end of that thread – the basic solution was to run a function to clear that specific post out of the cache. Admittedly not knowing a ton about how WordPress’ cache works and not wanting to break something by constantly clearing the cache for every single post and page, I ended up doing something like this…

if ($post->post_parent)	{
   if (!get_post_ancestors($post->ID)) { wp_cache_delete($post->ID, 'posts'); }
   $ancestors=get_post_ancestors($post->ID);
   ... }

At least this way the deletion only runs if the ancestry is already broken for a particular page. This is definitely the first time that I’ve ever had to dig this deep to root out a problem in WordPress … usually it’s a problem with my coding, not theirs! So anyways, that’s my story and all is now well in the universe – just had to share in case someone else one day stumbles across that same problem with get_post_ancestors() and they still haven’t fixed the bug yet…

Happy coding!

Sisterly Distractions of an Interweb Nature

If anyone wants to question my lack of productivity this evening, I think it’s safe that my sister is to blame for sending me a link to the following site…

http://picsauce.com/post/4962142316

http://picsauce.com/post/4956940417/the-author-vs-your-teacher

http://picsauce.com/post/4752903063/google-tells-it-like-it-is

http://picsauce.com/post/4446571149/honesty

http://picsauce.com/post/3383223936/taste-the-rainbow

Copying is Bad, Take Two

Earlier this week I wrote a post about creator copyright that was inspired by Nina Paley’s ridiculous little jingle called Copying Isn’t Theft. Still not able to get it off my mind, I’ve done some more exploring of the problem to really try and find the root of what I don’t like about it, and I think even more so than reprinting work like I mentioned previously, my big beef in the grander scheme centers more closely around the idea of derivative works.

Basically, “What can another artist do with your work?” Granted, I know that this can sometimes be somewhat of a slippery slope when skirting the lines of parody and fair use, but in general I think the most prominent example of my perspective on this is fanfic, which is very popular, but not often liked by many creators. Under copyright law, you can’t sit down and just write your own episode of The Simpsons because you’d be using characters and other IP that someone else had already created.

And frankly, I’m ok with that.

Sure, somebody might have a really good idea for an episode that they want to share – then go get hired into the writers’ room for the show and create your idea! Otherwise, at least to me it just doesn’t seem right to create something that isn’t actually mine to begin with, even if I do think that I’ve got a better line for Bart Simpson to say than “Aye carumba!” And think about it if you’re Matt Groening, the guy who created The Simpsons – through his own show, he still has creative control over the characters to say how they will and won’t be portrayed … this is lost with fanfic, which can be even more troublesome online when there’s a good possibility of such stories being confused with your own.

At best, continuity may be lost because I know that a lot of fanfic tends to involve mash-ups across multiple properties, and even worse, the characters may take on traits that Matt and his teams over the years have specifically worked very hard to avoid. Ever notice how most episodes of The Simpsons still today end with a sweet, endearing moment like Bart and Lisa playing together or Homer and Marge sharing a romantic moment, even amidst their own bizarre quirkiness? What happens when someone else starts writing in your world who doesn’t have the same dedication to these ideals that you have???

Maybe part of it, too, is that honestly I’ve never really shared much interest in wanting to create something new out of somebody else’s work. I want to write my own stuff, with my own characters and my own plot devices – sure, I love The Simpsons, but that was somebody else’s great idea and he’s the one who should get to create whatever new roads his characters decide to walk down. As flattering as you may think it would be to have somebody else create a new story in my own world, I’d much rather hear that they were so inspired by my work that they went and crafted something brand new themselves.

And I know that some of these comparisons don’t sync up the best to Nina’s original argument because she basically got busted for using copyrighted music from the 1920s in a film of hers that she assumed at the time wasn’t copyrighted. Unfortunately in that case, it’s sometimes difficult to verify the true rights behind some older IP, but at the same time it’s kind of hard for me to just write it off entirely – if she had been acting like a creative professional, she’d have accepted the true liabilities behind using materials which she wasn’t fully sure she had the rights to use and picked something else to be the soundtrack for her independent movie. Instead, she chose to focus solely on being an artist who just had to get this work out, and in the end it cost her $50,000 in licensing fees and she’s not even allowed to sell the movie anywhere afterwards.

Wouldn’t you think that at the very least, if your ability to make more art in the future was hinged on how your current work is published (i.e. I can’t make more movies now because I work three jobs to pay off my legal fees from the last movie), it would make more sense to just create your own art and for any instances where you are collaborating, make 110% sure that you have the necessary rights to do so? Nope, you may not necessarily be able to use that popular song because the rights are too expensive, even though you think they should be less because you’re on a low budget, but sorry – their toys, their rules. I can’t write my own episodes of The Simpsons, either, but I always have the freedom to create something entirely new that’s 100% my own – that’s what being a creative person is all about.

D&D After Dark

In taking photos of last night’s D&D game, I was kind of impressed with this particular one taken with my iPhone. Even though the lower half was very much washed out by the flash, it did make for some cool nighttime lighting effects for the party and the big baddie…


…albeit the fight was technically smack dab in the middle of the afternoon in Fallcrest!

While we’re at it, here are a couple of other memorable shots from the evening – first, another of the same encounter to give you an idea of what the lighting was really like, and then two others of when we proceeded down into the dank and nasty sewers in search of the true origin behind the city’s growing rat problem…


We ended up playing way past everyone’s bed time and didn’t even break the table until something like 1:30am, but it was still a lot of fun even as we were one-by-one beginning to run out of steam!

Coming soon to a doggie bed near us!


Now we’re not exactly collecting the whole set, mind you! As much chaotic fun as that would be, I think we’ll be sticking to just the one for now, thanks…

But that one little lady looking up at the camera, smack dab on top of the dogpile??? She’ll be establishing a permanent residence in our humble abode here in just a short couple of weeks.

It’s probably best to assume that you can expect many, many more pictures in the months to come…

Thin Post : Just a Matter of Scheduling

I get a little frustrated sometimes when I hear about that show The Biggest Loser on TV. On one hand, sure, it’s awesome that these people are losing dozens of pounds at each weigh-in – I certainly can’t begrudge them of that. But the thing is, so could I if I dedicated several months of my life solely to weight loss and absolutely nothing else…

I’m sure that most people who had the opportunity (and drive) to dedicate their entire day to nothing but exercise and eating healthy could make a significant dent in their own obesity, but that doesn’t work for the rest of us who have jobs and families and can’t simply whisk themselves away to fat camp when they’re starting to feel a little pudgy! For the rest of us, it’s a balancing act between living our lives while also simultaneously implementing these significant life changes so that we get to live the rest of our lives, and at least for me, it feels like it’s a constant struggle against the clock.

For example, I know that I need to do the following on a weekly basis:

  • eat wholesome, home-cooked meals
  • exercise at least 30-45 minutes several days a week
  • get a good night’s sleep of 6-8 hours each night
  • spend as much time writing as possible, so as to build my career
  • spend as much time with my wife as possible, so as to not warrant a divorce
  • relax, so as to not stress out over how I don’t have enough time in each week!

Add in all of my other roles and responsibilities, and it’s easy to see how each of them randomly gets neglected over a lack of time … which sucks because so many of them are interconnected – the exercise and eating right is counterproductive if I don’t get a decent night’s sleep, as I’m finding right now, and spending more time focusing on these means less time for relaxation, fun time with the wife, and advancing my writing career.

So is the solution to buckle down to a super-strict schedule where everything is rigorously defined to ensure that everything actually gets done??? Well, I can say from experience that it doesn’t work for my creative stuff because sometimes the ideas just aren’t there or don’t want to flow as easily as I’d like. Lately I’ve been starting to focus more on priorities – while everything is important, first and foremost I need to focus on the health stuff, then comes writing, and last is everything else. I think finding middle ground within all of the points is big, too – maybe I can’t do a full workout every other day, but varying durations gives me more time to spend with my wife or allows me to get that column done that I need to write for this week.

Boy, wouldn’t it be easier if I could just slough everything off and go on TV to get skinny instead?!

Copying IS theft!

I understand that the source is actually a little old, but this video about copying and copyright by Nina Paley that I was pointed to by the folks at webcomics.com really started to rub me the wrong way the more I started looking into it. But I think it was the cutesy, little jingle that she wrote that just pushed me over the edge…

Because here’s the thing – if the artist is behind sharing his or her work openly and they want to encourage derivative works, then more power to ‘em! Creative Commons is a great way for artists to relinquish some rights out to their fanbase while retaining others that they deem important, and it’s flexible enough to allow many variations. But just because you want your work to be free and openly distributable to the masses doesn’t necessarily mean that I want my work to do the same.

I’m not one who subscribes to the artsy theory that “the art just wants to be free” and that it “hinders the progress of culture” to put constraints on artistic expression. I know there are some who are happy living in poverty just for the sake of making their art, but that isn’t good enough for me. I want to be a writer and make a living from it, and to do so I need to retain a certain amount of control over the things that I produce.

Yes, my humor columns are available free of charge every week on my website, but that doesn’t mean that I want other people copying entire columns verbatim and posting them on their own sites. Not only do I miss out on advertising revenue, I’m not able to track statistics of who’s reading my work, I’m not able to provide the same experience by referring them to other columns I’ve written or promoting my book, and probably even more concerning than all of the above – what if I don’t actually want my work associated with their particular site???

A link and even a small excerpt are perfectly fine under Fair Use, however as a creator I think that I should have the right to say, “No thanks – I’d rather not have my work re-printed on your site because it has content that’s offensive to me.” Or included in your book, or quoted on your TV show, or whatever. Readers are more than welcome to enjoy my content via the means that I’ve made available, and even ask if there’s something (like e-books) that they’d like to see in the future, but in order to make money off of my own work I need to retain control of the things that I create and conventional copyright laws allow me to do just that.